We do this by assuming carefully selected catastrophe risk across the global property reinsurance landscape — always with careful consideration for the volatility we underwrite.
Within property catastrophe reinsurance, we operate a multi-strategy platform that allows us to allocate capital across the full spectrum of the market, including:
without being tethered to any one structure or market segment. This adaptability is a defining strength, especially during periods of market dislocation.
Underwriting with Precision
Our team has developed proprietary tools — including the Pillar Risk Optimization System (PROS) — to evaluate risk beyond what third-party catastrophe models alone can capture. We enhance vendor models with more than 20 years of exposure and claims data, adjusting for litigation trends, geographic spread, building cost inflation, and structural deficiencies.
Generally, potential trades are assessed both on a standalone and marginal basis — considering its expected loss ratio, absolute return on collateral, and contribution to the portfolio’s overall risk profile. We prioritize quality of data and deal structure, focusing on counterparties with strong historical performance and transparency across submission materials.
Controlling the Downside
In 2024 alone, our team reviewed approximately 2,500 trade submissions and declined roughly 80% of them — a reflection of our selectivity and standards in a market that often rewards volume over vigilance.
We also deliberately diversify across geography, peril type, and time, seeking opportunities in both peak and non-peak zones across the U.S., Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. We often favor smaller, regional insurers that allow for cleaner data, more customized structuring, and less systemic exposure.
Built for Market Cycles
We maintain a long-term orientation and do not chase absolute returns at the expense of prudence. Instead, we focus on compounding value for our investors over time, balancing conviction with discipline in how and where we assume risk.
Managing Inflows with Intention
We do not accept inflows simply because they are available. If market conditions do not support attractive deployment opportunities, we will slow or limit new commitments. In our view, protecting investor capital begins with selectivity — not just in the risk we underwrite, but in the acceptance of capital we agree to deploy.